FORZE parted ways with smooya following his Twitter post expressing support for Ukraine with the phrase “Glory to Ukraine”
British sniper Owen “smooya” Butterfield faced consequences when he expressed his support for Ukraine by writing “Glory to Ukraine” in response to Team Monte’s post celebrating their triumph over the Russian team. As a result, FORZE, the organization he was a part of, made the decision to expel him. The incident sparked controversy within the esports community, with opinions divided on whether his actions were justified or not. Some argued that players should be allowed to express their political views freely, as long as it does not incite hatred or violence. They believed that smooya’s comment was merely a gesture of support for Ukraine and its people, and should not be seen as a direct attack against Russia.
On the other hand, there were those who felt that smooya’s comment was inappropriate and violated the principle of remaining politically neutral in esports. They argued that professional players should refrain from making political statements that could potentially alienate fans and create tensions within the competitive gaming scene. FORZE, as an organization, had to consider the potential impact on their image and reputation. They made the decision to sever ties with smooya in order to distance themselves from the controversy and maintain a neutral stance. It served as a reminder that players are often held accountable for their actions, both on and off the gaming stage.
Table of Contents
Controversy Surrounds Smooya’s “Glory to Ukraine” Tweet and FORZE’s Decision
Smooya, the British sniper who has been a standout player for FORZE throughout ESL Pro League Season 19, found himself embroiled in controversy when he decided to join a Russian team. The Ukrainian community was quick to criticize his choice, with influential figure Alexey “yx0” Maletsky being the first to voice his disapproval. In response to Team Monte’s post celebrating their victory over the Russian team, Smooya commented, “What’s up @smooyacs? Enjoy to play CS with ruzzians terrorists.” This further fueled the debate within the Counter-Strike community about whether Smooya had made the right decision or not. However, Smooya took to social media to clarify his intentions. In a now-deleted post, he wrote, “I will make this clear once, I am not representing this organization. I’m not wearing their jersey. I’m attending ESL Pro League to hopefully show my ability to hopefully get scouted for a roster in the future. Not support any of this, so please shut the fuck up seriously.” Despite his explanation, the controversy surrounding Smooya’s decision continued to escalate. Alexander “petr1k” Petrik, another prominent figure, wished Smooya good luck but shifted the blame to the tournament organizers, stating that it was a mistake to allow such teams to compete and promote a Russian oil company. He expressed frustration at seeing Smooya, whom he considered a good guy, playing for a team associated with a company that supports Russian military activities. The stage was set for the first match between FORZE and Monte, with Smooya determined to prove himself despite the mounting criticism. Remarkably, Smooya emerged as the best player of the match, even though his team suffered a 2-0 defeat.
However, it was Smooya’s comment on Monte’s post about the victory that ultimately led to his expulsion from FORZE. He wrote, “Slava Ukraini,” which translates to “Glory to Ukraine.” The exact reason for his dismissal remains uncertain, but it is widely speculated that his comment was the catalyst. Within an hour, Smooya had deleted the message and left a cryptic statement, saying, “Crazy situation happening here, update you soon.” The following morning, FORZE announced that their coach, fierce, would be replacing Smooya in the upcoming match against FURIA. This decision raised eyebrows, as fierce had not played an official match since 2020, while Smooya had almost single-handedly won their previous game. FORZE’s decision to part ways with Smooya was undoubtedly a difficult one. The team is currently in the midst of a battle for survival, and losing a talented player like Smooya could have significant consequences. However, the organization also had to consider the potential damage to its reputation and the potential backlash from sponsors and fans if they retained Smooya on the roster. The future for Smooya remains uncertain. While he is undeniably a talented player, the controversy surrounding his recent actions may make it challenging for him to find a new team. The incident has ignited discussion within the esports community about the boundaries of personal expression, the role of politics in gaming, and the responsibilities of professional players. This incident serves as a reminder that esports is not just a game but a reflection of the real world. It highlights the complexities and challenges faced by players and organizations when navigating political and social issues. The controversy surrounding Smooya’s tweet will likely continue to be debated for some time, as it raises important questions about the intersection of esports and society as a whole.
Teammate Smooya and Other Esports Figures React to the Controversial “Glory to Ukraine” Tweet
Smooya’s teammate, xfl0ud, has come forward to express unwavering support for the embattled player. He emphasized that Smooya is not only a talented teammate but also a dear friend, and he hopes that Smooya will swiftly find a new team to continue his professional career. While xfl0ud’s support demonstrates the camaraderie within the team, the incident has sparked a wide range of reactions from the esports community, with opinions divided on Smooya’s actions. The controversy surrounding Smooya’s tweet and subsequent expulsion from FORZE once again brings to light the intricate intersection of politics and esports. It serves as a poignant reminder that the world of competitive gaming is not isolated from real-world issues but rather acts as a reflection of them. The incident has reignited discussions about the role and responsibility of professional players in expressing their personal beliefs and the potential consequences it may have on their careers. In the aftermath of the incident, social media and online forums have become a battleground for contrasting viewpoints. Some individuals have rallied behind Smooya, arguing for his right to free expression and supporting his display of national pride. They assert that personal beliefs should not impede professional opportunities and that the decision to remove Smooya from the team was unjust.
On the other side of the spectrum, critics have condemned Smooya’s actions, viewing them as divisive and inappropriate for a professional player. They argue that esports should remain neutral ground, free from political affiliations or nationalistic sentiments. For them, Smooya’s comment crossed a line and undermined the spirit of fair competition and sportsmanship. The incident has highlighted the complexities and challenges that arise when political issues seep into the realm of esports. The debate has extended beyond Smooya himself, sparking broader discussions about the responsibility of tournament organizers, team management, and sponsors in navigating these sensitive matters. Some argue that tournament organizers should establish clearer guidelines to avoid such controversies in the future, while others advocate for a more open and inclusive environment that respects the diverse backgrounds and beliefs of players. The reaction to Smooya’s tweet and subsequent events demonstrates that esports, like any other professional sport, is not immune to the influence of societal and political forces. It underscores the need for ongoing dialogue and reflection within the esports community on how to strike a balance between personal expression, competitive integrity, and the interests of teams, sponsors, and fans. As the controversy continues to unfold, it remains to be seen what the long-term implications will be for Smooya’s career and the wider esports landscape. The incident serves as a stark reminder that professional gaming is more than just a game; it is a microcosm of the real world, where actions and words can have lasting consequences and shape the perception and future opportunities of players and organizations alike.
